Results
of the enquiry about avalanche cartography in the same project
(by Montserrat Mases i Coberó and Glòria
Martí i Domènech ICC Barcelona - Spain)
RESULTS OF THE ENQUIRY ABOUT AVALANCHE
CARTOGRAPHY IN THE SAME PROJECT
In the SAME Project (Snow
Avalanche Mapping and Warning in Europe) an enquiry of avalanche
cartography has been sent to different European laboratories. The main
objective of the enquiry is to determine the state of the art in
avalanche mapping database and zoning in Europe and to provide an:
·
Inventory of different systems in use in
different partner countries, including digitised data bases
·
Inventory and typology of different kinds of
avalanche maps
·
Inventory of avalanche zoning procedures.
The answers received are:
Andorra-
One answer received from Andorra government.
Austria-
Two answers received from Innsbruck (FBVA.ILWL) and Graz (TUGRAZ.INW).
Spain-
Two answers received from Catalonia GC.DPT.ICC and Zaragoza (ITGE).
France-
Two answers received from CEMAGREF
Iceland-
Three answers received from IMOR.AS. Three kinds of maps: event map,
maximum extent map, evacuation maps.
Italy-
Five answers received. Two from Veneto, two from Trento and one from
Lombardia.
Norway-
One answer received from NGI.
Switzerland
- Two answers received: One from Davos (SFISAR) including information
about three kinds of maps; Communal avalanche hazard maps, a cantonal
avalanche atlas (Scale 1:25.000) and various avalanche path maps. The
second answer was from local avalanche observation authority of the
Bernese Alps region in Interlaken.
DIFFERENT KIND OF AVALANCHE MAPS IN EUROPE
From the enquiries received
the maps have been classified into 8 types.
1)
Avalanche paths maps
a)
French type
The countries that use this
cartography are:
|
Country, region |
Name |
Scale |
|
ANDORRA |
Cartografia de localització probable d'allaus |
1:25000, 1:10000 |
|
ARAGÓN (Spain) |
Mapa de peligrosidad de aludes |
1:25000, 1:5000 |
|
CATALONIA (Spain) |
Mapa de zones d'allaus |
1:25000 |
|
FRANCE |
Carte de localisation probable des avalanches |
1:25000, 1:20000 |
|
ITALY |
Carte di localizzazione probabile delle valanghe |
1:25000, 1:5000 |
- Methodology : The process is standard
(photointerpretation and surveys of the population). Models are not
used to determine runout distance except in France where proofs with
models are carried out.
- Information : in the document the outline of
avalanches is represented.
The map shows in orange the
avalanche paths determined by photointerpretation and field
observation, and in violet the paths determined by surveys of the
population. If there is coincidence of both observations, the colour of
avalanche path is the superposition of orange and violet. This means
that in these maps
there is a double entrance of information, which in many occasions is
complementary.
In the map the snow-drift erosion zones, the snow-drift deposition
zones
and the cornices can also be represented.
- Use :
|
Country
region |
Scientific |
Land planning |
Risk management |
Protection studies |
Authorisation |
Judicial use |
|
ANDORRA |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
ARAGÓN (Spain) |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
|
CATALONIA (Spain) |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
|
FRANCE |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
|
ITALY |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
-Legislation : Only France and Andorra have a
legislation related to avalanche paths maps. Some Italian regions
(i.e.: Lombardia) are preparing a law concerning to avalanche paths
maps.
b)
Icelandic
type (project) .
|
Country, region |
Name |
Scale |
|
Iceland |
Actual and probable avalanche
path maps |
? |
-Methodology
: enquiry, field observation, expert assessment.
-Information: They include the observed and potential
avalanche paths.
2)
Hazard maps
|
Country, region |
Name |
Scale |
|
AUSTRIA |
Hazard Zone
Map-Klostertal/Austrian Avalanche and Torrent Control |
> o equal a 1:2000 |
|
FRANCE |
Risk Map |
de 1:10000 a 1:1000 |
|
ITALY |
PZEV |
? |
|
Switzerland |
Communal avalanche hazard maps |
1:10000 and 1:15000 |
- Methodology : mathematical models, expert
and remote systems are used with avalanche cadastre data where the
outline of avalanches are represented. These models allow to determine
the extent of avalanche paths.
Field observations and
nivo-meteorological data are essential in this methodology.
Information : The terrain surface is divided
into zones with different danger rate. Lines dividing the
zones depend on the avalanche impact pressure and their periodicity.
The legend is standard. There
are four danger rates represented by different colours.
Red: very dangerous zones. The
red zones are:
A-
Avalanches with impact
pressures over 30 kN/m2 or more, with
a frequency less than 300 years.
B-
Avalanches with less impact
pressures, with a frequency less or equal than 30 years. In this area
people are in death danger and buildings can be destroyed.
Blue: Impact pressure is less
than 30 kN/m2 and frequency from 30 to 300
years. Zones with powder snow avalanches are signalled in blue when
the impact pressure is over 3 KN/m2 and
frequency is less than
30 years.
Yellow: Zones located in the
powder snow avalanches trajectory with impact pressure less than 3 kN/m2
and frequency more than 30 years.
Zone where the avalanches are
rare (frequency more than 300 years).
White: Zones without
avalanches.
- Use :
|
Country,
region |
Scientific |
land planning |
Risk management |
Protection
studies |
Authorisation |
Judicial use |
|
AUSTRIA |
Yes |
YES |
YES |
YES |
YES |
YES |
|
FRANCE |
|
YES |
YES |
YES |
YES |
No |
|
ITALY |
YES |
YES |
No |
No |
No |
No |
|
SWITZERLAND |
No |
YES |
YES |
YES |
YES |
YES |
-Legislation : In Austria, Switzerland,
France and Andorra maps are used in law.
i.e.. In Switzerland the
avalanches are included in forest and land planning laws. In France
they are included in housing, land planning and environment laws. In
Italy there aren’t avalanche laws but some regions have begun
to write laws related to the avalanches.
In Norway
the areas drawn in the hazard map have to be investigated
in more detail before house building or other landuse. The information
is public.
3)
Maximum extent map
|
Country, region |
Name |
Scale |
|
Iceland |
Maximum extent map |
1:5000, 1:10000 and 1:15000 |
|
NORWAy |
Historical registration maps |
1:5000 |
- Methodology : The icelandic maps are made
from field observations, archive consulting, and expert systems. The
norwegian maps are
based on eye witnesses, testimonies, historical records and sayings,
church books and
field observations shortly after avalanche events or later (summer)
field
studies of damage to the forest etc.
- Information : The icelandic map presents the
maximum extent of known avalanches. The information is divided into
three classes depending on the information accuracy.
In the norwegian
map lines show outer extension of the avalanches with year
of event.
- Use :
|
Country,
region |
Scientific |
Land planning |
Risk management |
Protection
studies |
Authorisation |
Judicial use |
|
ICELAND |
YES |
YES |
YES |
YES |
NO |
NO |
|
NORWAY |
YES |
YES |
YES |
YES |
NO |
NO |
-Legislation : The map
isn’t provided for in regulation.
4)
Avalanche maps
|
Country, region |
Name |
Scale |
|
ICELAND |
Avalanche maps |
1:5000, 1:10000 and 1:15000 |
- Methodology : They are
made from field observations archive consulting, and expert systems.
- Information : collection of recent
avalanches. Sometimes it includes the historic avalanches.
- Use :
|
Country,
region |
Scientific |
Land planning |
Risk management |
Protection
studies |
Authorisation |
Judicial use |
|
ICELAND |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
-Legislation : It isn’t provided for
in regulation.
5
) Evacuation maps
|
Country region |
Name |
Scale |
|
ICELAND |
Evacuation map |
1:5000, 1:10000 |
- Methodology :
They are made from field observations, archive consulting, and expert
systems.
- Information : They display the three levels
of evacuation used by IMO (Icelandic Meteorological Office) and
significant avalanches
- Use :
|
Country,
region |
Scientific |
Land planning |
Risk management |
Protection
studies |
Authorisations |
Judicial use |
|
ICELAND |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
-Legislation : Evacuation is regulated by the
law and the evacuation levels signalled in the map.
6
) Snow avalanche maps
|
Country, region |
name |
Scale |
|
NORWAY A |
Army snow avalanche maps |
1:50000 |
|
NORWAY B |
Hazard maps |
1:50000 |
- Methodology : The fist
is produced by the army. Made from digital terrain models, from field
observations archive consulting, and expert systems. Sometimes
testimonies are used.
- Information : In the first map are
represented the avalanche paths. Two colours are used: a) Starting
zones (with dangerous aspect) in red and b) Runout zones (terrain lying
below starting zones, which may be exposed to avalanche) in pink.
In the second map there is
information about other hazards. Red zones shows areas that can
potentially be reached by all kinds of slides (snow avalanches, rock
slides, debris flows and slushflows)
- Use :
|
Country,
region |
Scientific |
Land planning |
Risk management |
Protection
studies |
Authorisation |
Judicial use |
|
NORWAY A |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
|
NORWAY B |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
-Legislation : There are no regulations
associated with the map but it is adapted to the scale of avalanche
danger. For official use only (not
public).
7)
Avalanche atlas
|
Country, region |
Name |
Scale |
|
SWITZERLAND |
Avalanche Atlas of canton Uri |
1:25000 |
- Methodology : They are
made from field observations, testimonies, remote systems and field
evaluation.
- Information : Known avalanche release.
- Use : They are used to elaborate
danger maps
|
Country,
region |
Scientific |
Land planning |
Risk management |
Protection
studies |
Authorisation |
Judicial use |
|
SWITZERLAND |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
-Legislation : They have legal authority.
8)
Hazard line maps
|
Country, region |
Name |
Scale |
|
NORWAY |
Detailed hazard line maps |
1:5000 |
- Information: With lines
showing probable maximum avalanche runout
to be reached every 100, 333 and 1000 years.
Depending on the client’s wish, maps that show all kinds of
slides are sometimes produced.
- Use:
|
Country,
region |
Scientific |
Land planning |
Risk management |
Protection
studies |
Authorisation |
Judicial use |
|
NORWAY |
|
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
ABSTRACT ABOUT AVALANCHE CARTOGRAPHY. (Answers received from different
laboratories).
In the next paragraphs we
present an abstract of different answers to the enquiry. The
percentages are calculated from all the enquiries received from
different laboratories and organisms.
In some countries the central
government produces the avalanche cartography i.e.: France, Norway,
Andorra, Iceland Spain (Aragón). In other countries the
regions develop the cartography. I.e.: Italy, Switzerland, Austria,
Spain (Catalonia).
Every theme such as scale,
data organisation, legislation, type of information, use and
availability is commented.
Avalanche maps scale.
Different scales are used in Europe. More than a half of countries use two (or more) different scales.
The most used scale
are: 1/25.000 and 1/10.000. With less frequency 1/50.000, 1/5.000 and
1/1.000.
Data organisation
Around 65 % of the maps are
organised in Geographic Information Systems. The countries which
don’t use GIS are: some regions of Italy, some cantons of
Switzerland, and France. At present France tries to integrate the GIS
Arc-Info.
The most frequent GIS is
Arc-Info.
|
|
|
Legislation
Judicial role of maps.
Around 58% of maps have legal
implications. There is complete authority
of the map in: Austria, France, Switzerland and Andorra. With partial
authority: Iceland (Depending on the kind of map), Italy (depending on
the region). The
only country without legal regulation is Spain.
The legal protection is showed
in the next figure. In 36 % of cases, the avalanche map has no legal
implication. In 32% of the cases the map has complete authority. There
is no such authority in Norway and spain. Depending on the kind of map
there is legal authority in Iceland, and in some regions of Italy.
There is total legal authority in Austria, Switzerland, France and
Andorra.
Around 26% of countries, there
are directives or set requirements whom the laws are adapted.
Official use of maps
The avalanche maps can be used in land planning, in building construction, public works and closing, opening roads etc. In Norway the avalanche maps are not used in land planning. In Spain and Italy it depends on the regions. In Austria, Switzerland, Iceland and Andorra the avalanche maps are used in land planning.
There are several judicial
uses of avalanche maps in Europe. In Norway and Spain the maps have not
judicial use. In Italy depends on the regions. In Austria, France,
Switzerland and Andorra the avalanche maps have judicial use.
Type of mapped information.
Delimitation of zones
The kind of mapped information is variable. The most frequent is the outline of avalanches, which is used in the avalanche path maps.
Field observations
In the majority of the maps
field observations are used. In Norway only
the models are used in avalanche cartography. In Iceland the evacuation
map
is realised without field observations.
The three next figures show
the percentage of the countries that mapped
every event avalanche limit, the utmost avalanche limit, and the
paravalanche
works.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Model use (See [0])
The countries which always use models are Norway (topographic models. See [1]) and Austria (numerical models for powder and wet avalanches). France, Switzerland and Iceland sometimes use models. In France models developed by Cemagref are used (wet snow avalanche models and powder avalanche models). In Iceland to carry out the Evacuation maps two kinds of models are used: topographic ( a- b) (See [1]) and the PCM (See [2]) sliding block model. In Switzerland the Voellmy-Salm model is used. Italy and Spain don’t use models to generate avalanches map.
[0] Harbitz, C.B., 1998 : A survey of computational models for snow
avalanche motion. Norvegian
Geotechnical Institute, report 581220-1.
[1] Bakkehoi, S., Domaas, U. & Lied, K., 1983 : Calculation of snow
avalanche runout distance. Annals of Glaciology, Vol. 4, S. 24-29.
[2] Perla, P.I., Cheng, T.T. & McClung, D.M., 1980 : A two parameter model of
snow-avalanche motion. Journal of Glaciology, Vol. 26, Nº 94,
p. 197-207.
[3]
Salm, B., Burkard, A. & Gubler, H.U., 1990 : Berechnung von Fliesslawinen.
Eine Anleitung für den Praktiker mit Beispielen. Mitteilungen
des Eid. Institutes für Schnee- und Lawinenforschung, Nr. 47.
Expert’s assessment
In all the presented maps
expert’s assessment is used, in particular field observations.
On the other hand only a half
of laboratories use aerial photography and satellite photographs.
In the maps where models are
used, the results are tested with terrain data only in 26% of cases.
In 32% of maps there is
negotiation with those responsible from the mountain management
(regional or local authorities) before finishing the map.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Map’s use
The presented avalanche maps
are used in the four fields questioned.
Around 95% of the cases use
the avalanche maps in land planning, except
evacuation map of Iceland. In all enquired European countries there are
one
kind of avalanche map used in land planning as a minimum.
The majority of maps are used
in a scientific studies except the snow avalanche maps of Norway, the
Communal maps of Switzerland, and the evacuation maps of Iceland
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data availability
In all enquired countries
there are one public map as a minimum, except
in Norway.
The other kind of private maps
are: the Communal maps of Switzerland, the Arabba maps (Italy), the
Graz maps (Austria) and the risk maps of Cemagref (France).
Technical means of distribution
The more frequent technical
mean of distribution is paper. At present a
lot of organisms can distribute the data in digital files. Distribution
via
the Internet is used only by the 20% of the organisations involved in
the
enquiry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
